Started By
Message
Should all recreational drugs be made legal?
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:42 pm
I've heard this opinion brought up before and I can't say I don't disagree with it. It's a mix of freedom and Darwinism that makes me feel like it wouldn't be a bad idea. However, do you do anything to prevent possible dangers with more dangerous drugs if they are to be made legal? Is there anything that could prevent the dangers?
I can see both sides of the argument honestly.
I can see both sides of the argument honestly.
This post was edited on 8/13/14 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:45 pm to CNB
No
Drugs like meth and heroin should never, ever be legal
Drugs like meth and heroin should never, ever be legal
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:46 pm to CNB
Hell no. Where do you draw the line as far as "drugs"?
Also, try asking this on reddit, you will get an overwhelming "yes" answer and all sorts of anecdotal arguments for it, if you are looking for a specific answer
Also, try asking this on reddit, you will get an overwhelming "yes" answer and all sorts of anecdotal arguments for it, if you are looking for a specific answer
This post was edited on 8/13/14 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:46 pm to CNB
No. Pot and mushrooms are the only ones that should be legal, IMO.
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:48 pm to The Spleen
quote:
No. Pot and mushrooms are the only ones that should be legal, IMO.
Most hallucinogens should be as well
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:51 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
quote:
Hell no
Correct answer
Drugs for the public good should be for the public good.
Drugs against the public good should be illegal and the purveyors subject to extreme deterrents like lifetime hard labor or execution.
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:51 pm to Rebelgator
Eventually someone has to say yes.
Also, I know this will never happen.

Also, I know this will never happen.
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:52 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
Drugs against the public good
What exactly falls into this category? Are we talking simply more extreme?
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:54 pm to CNB
quote:
recreational drugs
What exactly falls into this category?
This post was edited on 8/13/14 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:56 pm to CNB
No. I do think they should let clean needle programs operate with freedom though. I know in some areas they are still hassled
Posted on 8/13/14 at 3:58 pm to diddydirtyAubie
Anything on the recreational drug use wikipedia page
Posted on 8/13/14 at 4:01 pm to CNB
I personally don't care what someone else does in their free time, in their own home, as long as it doesn't have an effect on me, at work, or on the road, or any public place.
If there was a way of testing for recent use of a drug, say the last 10 hours ( like there is with alcohol) then I wouldn't have any problem with it being legal,because maybe that would deter most people from getting high at work, or driving high.
As it is though, I don't think we can do that.
If there was a way of testing for recent use of a drug, say the last 10 hours ( like there is with alcohol) then I wouldn't have any problem with it being legal,because maybe that would deter most people from getting high at work, or driving high.
As it is though, I don't think we can do that.
Posted on 8/13/14 at 4:07 pm to CNB
Because people don't know how to act appropriately. And the benefits to me don't outweigh the change.
Posted on 8/13/14 at 4:08 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
quote:
And the benefits to me don't outweigh the change.
yes they do
Back to top
