Started By
Message
2
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:01 pm to Pettifogger
To say OM only lost Moncreif is retarded. Not to mention the issue there isn't that OM has declined. It's just that State has likely improved more, seeing as we literally only lost like 3 starters. At least one of which we upgrade from. Not to mention finishing the season on a much higher note and, frankly, dominating you with no QB or effective offensive play for all but half a quarter. Unfortunately, we both have to deal with being at best on par with Bama/LSU/AU, even though it could be a down year for all 3.
As good as I feel about this season for State, I still have to consider AU, Bama, and LSU toss ups at best. However, likely losses is probably the safer bet until we see what cards everyone has.
As good as I feel about this season for State, I still have to consider AU, Bama, and LSU toss ups at best. However, likely losses is probably the safer bet until we see what cards everyone has.
This post was edited on 8/7/14 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:05 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Huh? He's right, most would agree those are likely losses for Ole Miss.
Even MSU fans will disagree with making them a likely win against OM, but whatever.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News