re: Major difference between Mizzou and the rest of the SEC

quote:

---

You guys act like Mizzou has zero 3 and 4 star players on it's roster, it's quite hilarious

---

Clearly you don't have nearly as many as the major programs or your recruiting classes would be ranked higher. That's what I'm trying to tell you. You guys land a handful of solid players but then you fill out the rest of the recruiting class with 10+ two star guys and you won't win championships doing it that way. You need to fill each recruiting class with 3 and 4 star guys so you have a higher quality of depth and a better chance of finding breakout studs. Sure the occasional 2 star guy will develop into a stud but its much more likely for 3 and 4 star guys to develop into studs than 2 star guys. So filling your roster with at least 3 star talent will in the long term result in better quality depth as well as more breakout studs. Those are the two things that could raise Missouri to the upper echelon of SEC teams. You guys win a lot but you don't win against good teams because you don't have a similar level of firepower. Missouri under Pinkel is 4-20 vs top 10 teams and 15-34 vs top 25 teams.