Started By
Message
re: Texas vs Texas A&M
Posted on 8/1/14 at 7:52 am to SECdragonmaster
Posted on 8/1/14 at 7:52 am to SECdragonmaster
quote:
Have they already surpassed Texas in the national spotlight?
No, but that doesn't mean much. When someone says "UT" almost everyone in the nation thinks Texas not Tenn even though Tenn has a much better history. National spotlight doesn't mean much if you are losing, in fact it makes it worse.
quote:
Is this shift in the balance of power only because texas is struggling now?
And they made some bad decisions. Don't worry though, they will be back eventually. It would be stupid to assume otherwise.
A&M vs Texas is cute for the narrative, but if anything the football fates of both programs improved by not having an elimination round at the end of the year.
The real shift has been OU vs A&M. They went from being the FSU of Texas to being the UCF of Texas. We are skull fricking them for recruiting and undoing all that historical advantage they cheated to get.
Posted on 8/1/14 at 7:54 am to SECdragonmaster
quote:
Have they already surpassed Texas in the national spotlight?
LOL
Posted on 8/1/14 at 7:55 am to SECdragonmaster
Texas will always be the big bro.
76-37-5 against Texas A&M
875–339–33 (.715) All-time record
27–23–2 Postseason bowl record
32 Conference titles
53 Consensus All-Americans
702–456–48 (.602) All-time record
16-19 Postseason bowl record
18 Conference titles
22 Consensus All-Americans
76-37-5 against Texas A&M
875–339–33 (.715) All-time record
27–23–2 Postseason bowl record
32 Conference titles
53 Consensus All-Americans
702–456–48 (.602) All-time record
16-19 Postseason bowl record
18 Conference titles
22 Consensus All-Americans
Posted on 8/1/14 at 7:58 am to Sevendust912
quote:
A&M is running a rogue program while Strong is weeding out the riff raff from the Brown era and installing discipline in his team.
Yup. Give it five years. A&M will be on probation and Texas will be back in the title picture.
And just ftr, the only reason A&M was "in the spotlight" i was because (a) SEC expansion and (b) Johnny Manziel. It should be noted that they have not earned any attention on the field because they have not won any championships (unless you consider beating Bama winning a championship).
This post was edited on 8/1/14 at 8:00 am
Posted on 8/1/14 at 7:58 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
We are skull fricking them for recruiting
But all these recruits are heading to prison.
quote:
undoing all that historical advantage they cheated to get.
Didnt A+M just pay Seals-Jones 500k to come there?
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:00 am to IceColdBeer
The past few years are an aberration. Nothing more.
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:00 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
The real shift has been OU vs A&M. They went from being the FSU of Texas to being the UCF of Texas. We are skull fricking them for recruiting and undoing all that historical advantage they cheated to get.
Despite Bama's best efforts to undo it
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:00 am to TxTiger82
quote:
A&M will be on probation and Texas will be back in the title picture.
Lol at the NCAA doing shite to anyone that doesn't rape boys.
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:01 am to IceColdBeer
quote:
Didnt A+M just pay Seals-Jones 500k to come there?
Maybe, but we didn't get accused of it like LSU did
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:02 am to IceColdBeer
quote:
Didnt A+M just pay Seals-Jones 500k to come there?
No, other people offered to pay him that. He came to us because he liked us instead, Cam Newton-style.
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:03 am to Queen City Cock
quote:
The past few years are an aberration. Nothing more.
I am sure some Clemson fan feels the same way.
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:04 am to JCinBAMA
quote:
I think texas would beat a&m this year if they played.
Will either school be able to field a team at this rate?
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:07 am to cardboardboxer
This thread is about making fun of A&M. Not the Gamecocks. Keep it on topic please.
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:19 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Maybe, but we didn't get accused of it like LSU did
Oh ok, thanks for clarifying your schools cheating ways
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:25 am to Queen City Cock
You have to admit it makes a fine comparison though. I am sure if the rant existed 15 years ago and we asked the question
"Clemson vs USC"
there would be many posters saying that Clemson would ALWAYS be top dog in the state. Things change, not saying they have just that they can.
"Clemson vs USC"
there would be many posters saying that Clemson would ALWAYS be top dog in the state. Things change, not saying they have just that they can.
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:27 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
You have to admit it makes a fine comparison though.
Not really. Texas was one of CFB's blue bloods. Clemson, not really. Texas has won what? 4 titles now? Clemson has won 1 (and got pretty luck to win it, frankly, everyone else lost and they won by default).
Clemson was never on Texas' level. I know it pains you to realize that Texas was on that level, but they were.
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:29 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Maybe, but we didn't get accused of it like LSU did
We had all our T's crossed and i's dotted on that one.
Good thing.
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:31 am to TxTiger82
quote:
TxTiger82
All on that d this AM
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:32 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
All on that d this AM
And.........I got one.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News