Started By
Message

re: Honest Answer, LSU Fans...Cross-Div. Games

Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:54 pm to
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

2. Reconfigure the divisions as follows:

East: Carolina, UGA, UF, AU, alabama, UTenn, and UK

West: LSU, A&M, Mizzou, Arkansas, State, Ole MIss, and Vandy.


Damn son.

quote:

And let's be honest here: schools like State, Ole Miss, UK, and Vandy support the current setup because it is easier for them than a true rotation.




Totally agree.


I'm actually fine with getting rid of permanent opponents. Use that offering as leverage to negotiate going to a 9 game schedule. A 9 game schedule with no permanent opponents would be best for the overall health of the conference. What I dispute is the contention that LSU would have significantly more SEC and national titles if they did not have to play Florida every year. I think it is nothing but an excuse for a failure to beat Alabama when they needed to.
Posted by BigEdLSU
All around the south
Member since Sep 2010
20268 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:56 pm to
I didn't care before the playoffs. Now I care.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

I think it is nothing but an excuse for a failure to beat Alabama when they needed to.


What was Bama's reasoning behind the push for the "bye week" rule?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter