Started By
Message

re: Seriously, if not Bham -- where should the SEC

Posted on 7/28/14 at 3:10 am to
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3170 posts
Posted on 7/28/14 at 3:10 am to
quote:

It was originally in Jackson, Mississippi wasn't it?


Yes. Would be a good place to move it to, in my opinion. No one can accuse the Mississippi schools of ever unfairly benefiting from decisions made by the league office.
Posted by SoGaFan
Member since Jan 2008
5956 posts
Posted on 7/28/14 at 4:10 am to
I don't really care. I just wish CFB referees would be a nationally traveling entity rather than regionally based and an old boy network. Wasn't there an old man in full Bama regalia run over on the sidelines of their Spring game, and it came out he was the father of the SEC head of refs or something like that? SMH.

I would vote for ATL or Nashville, just because both those towns have a ton of varying influences that have nothing to do with college football, so it would be very hard for any one entity to gain influence. There is a reason they call it Bammerham, I would think.

Oh, and for those that call Atlanta soulless, I would recommend actually venturing into the city rather than flocking to planned communities 15-30 miles outside of it. I grew up in South Georgia, have lived in many places both in and outside the South, and I love Atlanta as a city.

However, as someone who would know once told me, it isn't the location, it is the influences on the man in charge that cause the most issues. There was a reason that Tennessee was the Teflon Don when Kramer was in charge.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter