Started By
Message

re: How the SEC Should Expand If It NEEDS 16

Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:35 pm to
Posted by Wardamnbulldog
Member since May 2014
648 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:35 pm to
The logical expansion would be to add AAC Teams(UCF, Houston, USF, SMU, Tulane, Tulsa, Cincy) which are in a weak conf but are in good recruiting states. Top picks being Tulsa(W)/USF(E) or UCF(E)/ Houston(W). Texas and Florida are such talented states that adding teams in those states would add to SEC notariety. These teams would most likely be more than willing to join and would expand our borders.
Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

The logical


I am on tRant. You lost me here

But in all seriousness we need to add UNC, and VT. This round of expansion would add the rest of the old confederacy (Except Mizzou ) and it would add two TV markets as well as open up those two states recruiting bases. (Btw Gurley and Marshall are from NC)
Posted by bgator85
Sarasota
Member since Aug 2007
6025 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

The logical expansion would be to add AAC Teams(UCF, Houston, USF, SMU, Tulane, Tulsa, Cincy) which are in a weak conf but are in good recruiting states. Top picks being Tulsa(W)/USF(E) or UCF(E)/ Houston(W)


I don't think this would ever happen. Not only do I think UF would be opposed to elevating these schools, but I think other SEC schools probably wouldn't be too happy about having to compete with UCF/USF for Florida recruits.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter