Started By
Message

re: Supreme Court rules in favor of Religious companies not covering contraception

Posted on 6/30/14 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69964 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

So, yes, what I'm describing is something that'd be subsidized with taxes, which means that a lot of people wouldn't support it out of some principle that I don't ascribe to



Sure, it's not your money, why the frick not?

Give more money to the government to manage on our behalf, because they're doing such a wonderful job with the money they already take in
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Sure, it's not your money, why the frick not?

Give more money to the government to manage on our behalf, because they're doing such a wonderful job with the money they already take in


So what are you advocating for here?

Governments collect taxes. They always have and they always will. Accept that and then advocate for policies that best use this money, and not just poo-poo on anything requiring some sort of government control or oversight.

Unless you're an anarchist, of course.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter