Started By
Message
re: Scientists prove climate change will cause heavy rainfall in Britain.
Posted on 6/2/14 at 5:36 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Posted on 6/2/14 at 5:36 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Abundance of food, higher consciousness, real connection with the earth and people and animals. Avatarish type reality would be living the life.
To each their own.
Posted on 6/2/14 at 5:38 pm to cas4t
quote:
Climate change IS happening.
Sure, but to blame it all on human behavior is pretty dumb.
Posted on 6/2/14 at 5:46 pm to kywildcatfanone
It's a highly politicized issue where the data has been contorted to score points for one side or the other. Climate change is occurring, unlike what many conservative politicians say. However, unlike what many liberals claim, it is not happening nearly as rapidly as their "data" seems to indicate and the evidence of man being the primary dictator of the change is minimal. An objective view of the pure science shows that the climate is warming, but to claim with absolution why at this point is not a well grounded proposition.
It's a shame too, because it gives all of the anti-science minions ammo with which to use against other aspects of science which do not fit this description but that they still "disagree" with.
It's a shame too, because it gives all of the anti-science minions ammo with which to use against other aspects of science which do not fit this description but that they still "disagree" with.
Posted on 6/2/14 at 5:57 pm to cas4t
An accurate OP title would have been some scientists predict climate change will result in more rain for Britain.
quote:so true
It's a highly politicized issue
quote:So false
where the data has been contorted
This post was edited on 6/2/14 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:02 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
where the data has been contorted
So false
Wrong again, Captain Dipshit
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:03 pm to Vols&Shaft83
If you've got any credible links otherwise pull Michael Sam's dick out of your arse and post em up
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:04 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
MIZ_COU
You serious Clark?
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:06 pm to kywildcatfanone
Yes. Are you science illiterates serious?
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:07 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
So false
Interesting, given that both the climate change deniers and the fullblown "We're gonna die" treehuggers use the same sources of "data" to support their respective positions.
This post was edited on 6/2/14 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:08 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
To each their own.
Not really.
Everyone individually driving around in oil using, pollution making machines. Slaving away for small bits of relaxation, limited connection to the planet, millions starving, and so on.. isn't 'living the life', it's really not an opinion kind of thing.
Disclaimer for the zero summers - I just read a chapter while sitting on my back porch in the wonderful evening sun. In that moment I was 'living the life', I'm sure the broadness of this concept isn't going to resonate, not sure why I'm even explaining it.
This post was edited on 6/2/14 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:15 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:exactly, if only conservatives wanted to conserve.
To rule out the possibility that pumping all the shite we have into the atmosphere has had no effect on climate change is narrow minded.
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:16 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Not really.
Didnt catch it.
Oh well, moving on...
quote:
Everyone individually driving around in oil using, pollution making machines. Slaving away for small bits of relaxation, limited connection to the planet, millions starving, and so on.. isn't 'living the life', it's really not an opinion kind of thing.
I love my life. Sure I work hard, but I get a lot of satisfaction out of what I do. I get to come home every day knowing I made at least some small difference in the lives of others.
I have a great wife, a great family, my health, etc. I love what I have, and only an exceedingly arrogant mind could believe that one cannot "live the life" in the context of the society you despise so much. It most certainly is an opinion.
quote:
Disclaimer for the zero summers - I just read a chapter while sitting on my back porch in the wonderful evening sun. In that moment I was 'living the life', I'm sure the broadness of this concept isn't going to resonate, not sure why I'm even explaining it.
Im glad you've found happiness, but your experience doesnt define "living the life".
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:22 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
I love my life. Sure I work hard, but I get a lot of satisfaction out of what I do. I get to come home every day knowing I made at least some small difference in the lives of others.
I have a great wife, a great family, my health, etc. I love what I have, and only an exceedingly arrogant mind could believe that one cannot "live the life" in the context of the society you despise so much. It most certainly is an opinion.
What you just said is exactly what I said in my 'disclaimer'.
shite went over your head, not sure how, a guy like Delta I'd understand but you don't have an excuse.
This post was edited on 6/2/14 at 6:23 pm
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:23 pm to TT9
quote:
exactly, if only conservatives wanted to conserve.
It is ironic, isn't it.
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:25 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Very, and it's sad as well considering.
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:31 pm to Sleeping Tiger
You cant make a single post without being condescending, can you? It is simply beyond the scope of your abilities.
You made an absolute statement, followed by a trivial disclaimer about one small aspect of life and then claimed the disclaimer was all-encompassing after being refuted. In order for your "disclaimer" to say what you have now claimed it says would invalidate your initial absolute statement.
Essentially, you are now saying that the traditional American lifestyle sucks absolutely except when it doesnt, and that exception only applies to what you say it applies to. Its both illogical and incredibly arrogant.
You made an absolute statement, followed by a trivial disclaimer about one small aspect of life and then claimed the disclaimer was all-encompassing after being refuted. In order for your "disclaimer" to say what you have now claimed it says would invalidate your initial absolute statement.
Essentially, you are now saying that the traditional American lifestyle sucks absolutely except when it doesnt, and that exception only applies to what you say it applies to. Its both illogical and incredibly arrogant.
This post was edited on 6/2/14 at 6:34 pm
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:35 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Essentially, you are now saying that the traditional American lifestyle sucks absolutely except when it doesnt, and that exception only applies to what you say it applies to. Its both illogical and incredibly arrogant.
Nope, you didn't get it. Not entirely your fault, though.
quote:
You cant make a single post without being condescending, can you?
I'll admit that I'm condescending at times, sometimes more often than others, but you do realize that you're at least equally as guilty, right?
This post was edited on 6/2/14 at 6:36 pm
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:39 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I'll admit that I'm condescending at times, sometimes more often than others, but you do realize that you're at least equally as guilty, right?
if he says he isn't, the I say Klarvin is a lying no good cock juggling thunder count.
Posted on 6/2/14 at 6:41 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Guilty? Absolutely, but certainly not equally so. Your level of arrogance borders on a delusional personal disorder.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News