Started By
Message

re: Pac-12 zooms past Big Ten, SEC in college sports revenue

Posted on 5/25/14 at 7:02 pm to
Posted by Raoul_Duke
Denton, TX
Member since Nov 2012
235 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

quote: They own all their network, correct? Correct 100% of carriage + 100% of advertising. Of all the Big 5 they have the biggest upside by the time contracts renegotiate around 2024. Having only 12 teams also means fewer slices of the pie. Unlike the B12, they have a solid footprint with growing states, a natural moat, and monopoly pricing power.


This is why we shouldn't have done the deal with ESPN. The coverage and immediate guaranteed money in the short term will be great, but 10 years from now we will know we signed a deal with the devil and wish we owned 100% of SEC network
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

The coverage and immediate guaranteed money in the short term will be great, but 10 years from now we will know we signed a deal with the devil and wish we owned 100% of SEC network


While I agree about 90% here the problem is the 3 issues that are problems for the footprint.

#1 no moat
#2 no monopoly in big states
#3 smaller footprint compared to B1G and PAC
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter