Started By
Message
re: Why is Auburn the only member of the "big 6" unable to sustain success?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 9:17 pm to MrAUTigers
Posted on 4/22/14 at 9:17 pm to MrAUTigers
But being that Alabama can do nothing about vacated or forfeited wins, the records from 1983-2013 are as follows:
Auburn 264-111
Alabama 245-120
Interesting that we lost 30 total wins and it is still that similar.
But why do we always use 1983-present? When did that become some cut-off point, other than when Bryant retired?
Auburn 264-111
Alabama 245-120
Interesting that we lost 30 total wins and it is still that similar.
But why do we always use 1983-present? When did that become some cut-off point, other than when Bryant retired?
1
Posted on 4/22/14 at 9:21 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
But being that Alabama can do nothing about vacated or forfeited wins, the records from 1983-2013 are as follows: Auburn 264-111 Alabama 245-120 Interesting that we lost 30 total wins and it is still that similar. But why do we always use 1983-present? When did that become some cut-off point, other than when Bryant retired?
The interesting question is which of those would a fan prefer, including all accomplishments?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News