Started By
Message
re: Why is Auburn the only member of the "big 6" unable to sustain success?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 9:03 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Posted on 4/22/14 at 9:03 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Stassen is working again...
1983-1999
Alabama 141-65
Auburn 139-56
This includes Alabama's 9 forfeited games in 1993 (wins turned to losses).
So you won 2 more games than Auburn and lost 9 more games? It looks like Auburn has a better winning percentage over that time frame. Auburn also had a better winning percentage from 2000-2013. That tells me that since bear died, even with the great saban run, that Auburn has a better winning percentage. That's interesting.
3
Posted on 4/22/14 at 9:05 pm to MrAUTigers
National titles are the only worthy measuring sticks.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 9:09 pm to MrAUTigers
Thanks to vacated and forfeited games. Does that actually reflect anything? I don't know.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 9:50 pm to MrAUTigers
Yet it has absolutely nothing to do with the OP.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News