Started By
Message
re: Why is Auburn the only member of the "big 6" unable to sustain success?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:54 pm to beatbammer
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:54 pm to beatbammer
quote:
In general, Auburn can beat Bama at any time. Bama, however, can only beat average to bad Auburn teams.
And yet somehow Alabama has a healthy lead in the series overall.
According to your logic that means Auburn sucks most of the time.
5
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:56 pm to IAmReality
quote:
And yet somehow Alabama has a healthy lead in the series overall.
According to your logic that means Auburn sucks most of the time
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:56 pm to IAmReality
They'll just ask you to subtract the Bryant and Saban years..
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:57 pm to IAmReality
quote:
And yet somehow Alabama has a healthy lead in the series overall.
According to your logic that means Auburn sucks most of the time.
Nope, you just had the greatest coach in college football history for about 25 years and he beat us like a red-headed step-child.
Outside of that one singular era? Not even close.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:57 pm to IAmReality
quote:
Auburn sucks most of the time.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:58 pm to IAmReality
quote:
And yet somehow Alabama has a healthy lead in the series overall.
According to your logic that means Auburn sucks most of the time.
Not exactly. bear owned our arse. The truth is....Auburn won more games before bear....Auburn won more games after bear......Auburn struggled to beat bear. That is where your "hefty lead" comes from.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News