Started By
Message

re: Intelligent Design Vs. Evolution

Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:43 pm to
Posted by beejon
University Of Louisiana Warhawks
Member since Nov 2008
7959 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Nope. That's the philosophy that you want it to be.


What is the purpose of life other than to survive and reproduce in the atheistic Darwinist view?
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

What is the purpose of life other than to survive and reproduce in the atheistic Darwinist view?



The purpose of life, as I see it, is to live it however you want to live it so long as you're kind and respectful to your fellow man. In that sense, I believe that people should make their lives whatever they want them to be and enjoy their time as best as they can.

But that's just me.

EDIT: Can you conceive of the fact that there IS no life philosophy inherent in evolution? Because I honestly don't think there is.
This post was edited on 4/14/14 at 1:57 pm
Posted by VaBamaMan
North AL
Member since Apr 2013
7662 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:52 pm to
Posted by RTOTA
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2010
588 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 1:59 pm to
Don't get into morality and purpose of life bullshite arguments, you will get owned yet again. You try to misrepresent evolution and atheism, yet you demonstrate that you actually know little about either. I'm willing to bet you don't actually believe in the bible, if you followed its laws your actions would land you in prison. Fun reading: LINK
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

What is the purpose of life other than to survive and reproduce in the atheistic Darwinist view?


The onus is upon theists to do the research necessary to show that a deity should be included in science. Since no scientific theory excludes new input, any research would be subjected to peer reviews that would determine if the research results could be duplicated.

If they could be duplicated, then the results would be added to the theory. If they could not be duplicated, then they would be rejected. This is a self-evident principle of science.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter