re: Intelligent Design Vs. Evolution

quote:

---

Just try to maintain your objectivity - that is all.

---

What evidence do you actually have? Where is this litany of evidence?

Like I said: He deals with the "consensus". You asking me to be objective while simultaneously dismissing a video of a VERY well-respected scholar who's debated William Lane Craig over this as well as Ehrman (who has ultimately changed his mind and is slowly progressing toward myth). You can't call someone bias while immediately dismissing everything just because it doesn't meet the scientific consensus.

Get off your cross and stop telling me I'm bias, it's clearly psychological projection from your end. "Psychological projection is the act or technique of defending yourself against unpleasant impulses by denying their existence in yourself, while attributing them to others.[1]"

This whole conversation has basically gone:

Where's the evidence?
You're biased. There's a consensus.
Well what about the anonymous authorship?
You're biased. There's a consensus.
What about the increasing trend of people rejecting the historicity of Jesus?
You're biased. There's a consensus.
What about the questionable approach to historical consensus?
You're biased. There's a consensus.

Seriously, give evidence or refute -- don't just go off like a broken record because you've got yourself a shite argument.