Started By
Message
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:24 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
And that's not evolution. Are you an invalid?
He was, but thanks to evolution he grew out of it.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:26 am to Roger Klarvin
[quote]It's a red herring that creationists use to "discredit" evolution, not realizing in their ignorance that nothing in evolutionary theory is based on them.[/quote
First they are introduced as "evidence of evolution" now "nothing in evolutionary theory is based on them" ....classic darwinistic tactic ...the "evidence" of evolution is chock full of speculative conjecture and outright falsification
First they are introduced as "evidence of evolution" now "nothing in evolutionary theory is based on them" ....classic darwinistic tactic ...the "evidence" of evolution is chock full of speculative conjecture and outright falsification
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:27 am to mattloc
quote:
First they are introduced as "evidence of evolution" now "nothing in evolutionary theory is based on them" ....classic darwinistic tactic ...the "evidence" of evolution is chock full of speculative conjecture and outright falsification
The Book of Genesis is a fairy tale.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:27 am to Duke
quote:
You really must enjoy beating your head against a wall over and over again.
About an hour ago I was like: Maybe I'll write a bit of my book today, knock out the next chapter.
Five minutes ago I was like: Maybe I'll take a nap.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:27 am to beejon
quote:
What does random mutation do if not produce new life forms?
It produces mutations in DNA, mutations which are either deleterious, beneficial or have no effect either way.
Mutation doesn't produce new organisms. Selection does by selecting for advantageous traits in a very non-random manner.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:28 am to mattloc
quote:
First they are introduced as "evidence of evolution" now "nothing in evolutionary theory is based on them" ....classic darwinistic tactic ...the "evidence" of evolution is chock full of speculative conjecture and outright falsification
*sigh*
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:30 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
The Book of Genesis is a fairy tale.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:31 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
It produces mutations in DNA, mutations which are either deleterious, beneficial or have no effect either way.
Mutation doesn't produce new organisms. Selection does by selecting for advantageous traits in a very non-random manner.
And all this is based on the fact that we all have DNA. These inbred fricks in Dixie sure believe in DNA when Maury tells them they are not the father, but when it tells them Adam wasn't the father of us all, it's voodoo.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:31 am to beejon
quote:
I want you to name one, especially a biologist.
LINK
You linked me to the Discovery Institute?
I take it you didn't click my link on Kitzmiller v. Dover?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:32 am to mattloc
quote:
It's funny how many people believe it, I agree.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:33 am to beejon
quote:
And I don't pour milk on my cereal.
Did you just eventually give up, or do you have someone else do it for you?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:33 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
And all this is based on the fact that we all have DNA. These inbred fricks in Dixie sure believe in DNA when Maury tells them they are not the father, but when it tells them Adam wasn't the father of us all, it's voodoo.
Which Chimp is the "father of us all" has he been identified
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:33 am to TeLeFaWx
Yeah, I bet the Pac-12 message boards don't have to deal with this shite very often. The one down side of being in the SEC is that the fanbases have lots more...for lack of a better term, gumps. ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:34 am to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
You linked me to the Discovery Institute?
He just doesn't get it.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:34 am to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
"At least one signatory of A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism has abandoned the list, saying he felt misled. Robert C. Davidson, a Christian, scientist, doctor, and retired nephrology professor at the University of Washington medical school said after having signed he was shocked when he discovered that the Discovery Institute was calling evolution a "theory in crisis". "It's laughable: There have been millions of experiments over more than a century that support evolution," said Davidson. "There's always questions being asked about parts of the theory, as there are with any theory, but there's no real scientific controversy about it. ... When I joined I didn't think they were about bashing evolution. It's pseudo-science, at best. ... What they're doing is instigating a conflict between science and religion."[50]
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:34 am to mattloc
quote:
Which Chimp is the "father of us all" has he been identified
We didn't evolve from chimps. We are a mix of Neanderthals and some other homos. Chimps are evolved from some of the same ancestors though.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:35 am to mattloc
quote:
Which Chimp is the "father of us all" has he been identified
We didn't evolve from chimps.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:37 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
We didn't evolve from chimps. We are a mix of Neanderthals and some other homos. Chimps are evolved from some of the same ancestors though.
and how did you string that bit info together.... does your DNA evidence illustrate this,if so demonstrate it for us in this thread.... or is that a "fairy tale" you happen to believe
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:37 am to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
After more than a decade of effort the Discovery Institute proudly announced in 2007 that it had got some 700 doctoral-level scientists and engineers to sign "A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism." Though the number may strike some observers as rather large, it represented less than 0.023 percent of the world's scientists. On the scientific front of the much ballyhooed "Evolution Wars", the Darwinists were winning handily. The ideological struggle between (methodological) naturalism and supernaturalism continued largely in the fantasies of the faithful and the hyperbole of the press.[13]
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)