Started By
Message
re: Lsu AD - other SEC AD's aren't being fair.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 2:21 pm to Duke
Posted on 3/20/14 at 2:21 pm to Duke
quote:
The disparity year to year is the problem
That's the nature of college ball. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't.
quote:
Alabama is eventually going to be on the wrong end of it
Like when Tenn was killing it in the late 90's?
quote:
Why do we want to continue with this method?
Traditional rivalries set college ball apart. I would seriously lose some interest, if traditional rivalries are lost.
2
Posted on 3/20/14 at 2:26 pm to Alahunter
quote:
That's the nature of college ball. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't.
So that means it's not worth trying something new? Status-quo foreva!!
quote:
Like when Tenn was killing it in the late 90's?
1999, a year that worked out for Bama saw them go to the Swamp and get Tennessee. It was good that State was the only competition for the West crown that year. I don't like that the schedule makers can make or break champions. It's hardly an unreasonable position.
quote:
Traditional rivalries set college ball apart. I would seriously lose some interest, if traditional rivalries are lost.
Enough to stop watching? I doubt it.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 2:30 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Alabama is eventually going to be on the wrong end of it
Like when Tenn was killing it in the late 90's?
[Head explodes]
Who were they at a competitive disadvantage to? Florida was better than Tennessee. Most of the Western division was very down at the end of the 90s - MSU was arguably the most accomplished team from the west for a two year stretch. Auburn won 8 games combined between 98 and 99. LSU won SEVEN games combined between 98 and 99. That is terrible.
What would be wrong with just counting division games for the respective division championships? That would render the out of division rotation debates mostly moot and make competition within the division pretty equitable
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News