Started By
Message

re: New evidence that Grantham's D was too complicated?

Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:13 pm to
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
12539 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:13 pm to
It may have been complicated, but college offenses and defenses are very, very more complex than high school, so frankly, it is hard to say how complex they really were. I think the bigger issue is most players did not like him and that he held grudges against players. If he was affable and the D was kicking arse, no one would have said shite about his scheme...
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26000 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:30 pm to
I agree.

The ordeal about the playbook is that it was thick because it was simplified.

Each playcall has to fit against each offensive alignment and motion that the offense throws at you.
Instead of one page for the playcall, it illustrated for dummies how each player reacts to motions and formation changes.

It is one thing to give a kid a play and tell him to learn it.
It is another to tell him how that play is affected by the tight end flaring out or with a slot man in motion. Or how his keys change if the slot guy motions into a power run formation.

Pruitt is going to have linebackers doing safety responsibilities. He will have corners doing safety responsibilities. He will have DEs dropping into zone more often. Pruitt blitzes (run blitz especially) a lot and that means more players are going to have to cover responsibilities and techniques that are not to their natural strengths.
Posted by JimDawginTexas
Member since Sep 2012
1538 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

held grudges against players


Wasn't that the claim about Rodney Garner?

Wonder what our special teams complaint will be next year?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter