Started By
Message

re: moral equivalency? hunh vs flopping

Posted on 3/11/14 at 5:01 pm to
Posted by Won3ofTheLast5
Member since Mar 2014
370 posts
Posted on 3/11/14 at 5:01 pm to
I'm not against running any offense, but this style of play is about taking advantage of a rule change in 2008, and the people that like that Offense are squawking because other teams want the rules changed so it can't be taken advantage of like is now. Simple enough.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 3/11/14 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

I'm not against running any offense, but this style of play is about taking advantage of a rule change in 2008, and the people that like that Offense are squawking because other teams want the rules changed so it can't be taken advantage of like is now. Simple enough.


What rule are they taking advantage of?
Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 3/11/14 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

but this style of play is about taking advantage of a rule change in 2008
Why can't you answer a simple question?

If the HUNH was ineffective before the rule change in 2008, then explain why Tulsa, Missouri, Oregon, TTU, Oklahoma State, all finished inside the top 10 in total offense in 2007?
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30319 posts
Posted on 3/11/14 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

Won3ofTheLast5
WHY in the world did you drag up this old thread?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter