Started By
Message
re: moral equivalency? hunh vs flopping
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:18 pm to arrakis
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:18 pm to arrakis
quote:and yet you failed to link my reply, which made my position on it pretty clear. faking an injury when you dont have one is unethical and against the rules, but what defines an injury worthy of stopping play, and who is going to say which injuries those are? gray area.
So, you said "flopping" was within the rules of the game (I posted your quote) so tell us if it meets the criteria of an unfair act. Scared to back up your mouth, are you?
1
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:23 pm to narddogg81
quote:
and yet you failed to link my reply, which made my position on it pretty clear. faking an injury when you dont have one is unethical and against the rules, but what defines an injury worthy of stopping play, and who is going to say which injuries those are? gray area.
So, you didn't post this or simply backtracking once you realized you posted bullshite?
quote:
i believe its more accurate to say flopping is against the ethics of the rules and hunh is against the spirit of the game, ie the game is the interaction between the play called on offense and the defensive play called to counter. what makes football great is that it operates on multiple levels. a stated goal of the hunh is to prevent ds from getting in plays, or at least the play the want. both are currently within the rules as they stand
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News