Started By
Message

re: moral equivalency? hunh vs flopping

Posted on 3/8/14 at 2:46 pm to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111795 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Also, you sure changed gears after i destroyed you in the previous argument

No, you didn't destroy me in any argument. There's nothing in the rules which demonstrates substitution on every play is part of the "spirit of the rules" of football. But you have no idea what that even means, so I stopped talking about it.

You realize that you're making the same arguments against the HUNH that were made against having separate offensive and defensive units when the substitution rules changed back in the middle of the last century?
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19730 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

No, you didn't destroy me in any argument. There's nothing in the rules which demonstrates substitution on every play is part of the "spirit of the rules" of football. But you have no idea what that even means, so I stopped talking about it.
i was referring to your assertion of a logical fallacy in my previous post, not that aside on another persons post.

quote:

You realize that you're making the same arguments against the HUNH that were made against having separate offensive and defensive units when the substitution rules changed back in the middle of the last century?
dont exaggerate. the change to specialized platoons was a complete revision of the game, more so than the forward pass. this is a minor squabble about refs and presnap procedure in comparison. hyperbole is usually a sign of desperation in a debate.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter