Started By
Message
re: A Redditor's Objective Mathematical SEC HC Ranking
Posted on 3/6/14 at 10:57 am to The White Lobster
Posted on 3/6/14 at 10:57 am to The White Lobster
quote:
if alabama beats auburn in overtime along with georgia beating auburn, then malzahn would 'grade out' as like the 8th best coach.
But they didn't. Auburn was the better team. If you didn't believe it that night, you probably believed it after Oklahoma trounced Alabama, didn't you? Alabama had a better recruited team, well in to the Process, with a senior QB who finished second in the Heisman voting... and they STILL weren't as good as an Auburn team with a safety for a quarterback.
2
Posted on 3/6/14 at 11:00 am to TeLeFaWx
He wasn't commenting on whether or not he thought Auburn was better than Alabama. He was just saying a ranking where one play can make a coach go from 1st to 8th is dumb.
Posted on 3/6/14 at 11:02 am to TeLeFaWx
lol okay. not sure what this has to do with my post on this 'objective' 'ranking' system.
the field goal return by auburn did not change my opinion of saban or malzahn as coaches or even auburn or alabama as a team, though it did change the outcome of that one game in a sport of mass variance.
the field goal return by auburn did not change my opinion of saban or malzahn as coaches or even auburn or alabama as a team, though it did change the outcome of that one game in a sport of mass variance.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News