Started By
Message
re: Auburn May Add National Championships
Posted on 1/31/14 at 6:36 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Posted on 1/31/14 at 6:36 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
I think it makes sense to examine the seasons and make a judgement call. Until there is a true playoff, there is a lot of subjectivity. I haven't looked at all of them, but I think at least some of these are legitimate. Any year that Auburn played a full schedule and went undefeated seems pretty reasonable to me.
1913: Auburn was 8-0 and only gave up 13 points the entire season. Recognize it.
1993: Auburn was undefeated, but did not play in the SECCG or a bowl game, so I don't think that one would be legitimate.
2004: Auburn was undefeated in the SEC and the "official" BCS champions later had their victories vacated. Recognize it.
1913: Auburn was 8-0 and only gave up 13 points the entire season. Recognize it.
1993: Auburn was undefeated, but did not play in the SECCG or a bowl game, so I don't think that one would be legitimate.
2004: Auburn was undefeated in the SEC and the "official" BCS champions later had their victories vacated. Recognize it.
1
Posted on 1/31/14 at 8:46 pm to GumBro Jackson
I am just fine with them recognizing as many as they want. I don't see why other fanbases have a problem with it. They definitely got robbed in '04. This is a topic that should only affect Auburn fans.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News