Started By
Message
re: Better running back: Tre Mason or Mark Ingram
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:44 am to coachcrisp
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:44 am to coachcrisp
Nope, just smart enough to know that a guy who has averaged less than 500 yards a year, as a pro, isn't going to "get paid". It doesn't take intelligence to figure that out. It takes a little common sense. I am sure the Saints want to re-sign some of their practice squad guys. That doesn't mean they are going to pay them good money.
2
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:52 am to MrAUTigers
"The collapse" has angered you. I guess you guys aren't all just happy to be there. This past season was basically a moral season instead of just one moral victory.
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:56 am to MrAUTigers
Mason is a relative unknown. Mason is more explosive.
Ingram is solid and steady but his ceiling is known. Seems like Ingram is improving, and is pretty good at breaking tackles, but he doesn't pose as much of a big play threat.
I'd take Mason, but it depends on your system and what you are asking of your RBs.
Ingram is solid and steady but his ceiling is known. Seems like Ingram is improving, and is pretty good at breaking tackles, but he doesn't pose as much of a big play threat.
I'd take Mason, but it depends on your system and what you are asking of your RBs.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News