Started By
Message

re: First half Auburn success because of stealing signals?

Posted on 1/7/14 at 2:33 pm to
Posted by piggilicious
Member since Jan 2011
37301 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

That wasn't great coaching, it was poor D execution.


curious then- do you think gus coached a great 1st half?

Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28314 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

curious then- do you think gus coached a great 1st half?


Outstanding first half. We had the opportunity to put 10 more points on the board. Bad execution by the players cosy us there. (missed FG and wide open WR for TD that wasn't caught/not great throw) I thought he coached a poor third quarter. FSU made good halftime adjustment and Gus didn't adjust until the fourth.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79523 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

curious then- do you think gus coached a great 1st half?


According to most of the country, Gus is coaching a top 15 team while Jimbo was coaching a team of NFL first round players.

Play calling by Malzahn was excellent at times in the first half. Jimbo called a fine game, especially in the second half, but I'd put more credit on FSU's improved execution and Auburn's defensive/ST lapses.

In sum, I think Auburn's success is more reliant on Gus than FSU's is on Jimbo. So in that manner, the disparity can exist without really putting down anything Jimbo did.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter