Mizzou had no freakin' defense.

FSU has a defense - a real (NFL player type) defense.

They have had it all year.

Just like when Oregon runs into NFL-caliber lineman...this Auburn choo-choo train won't be humming like they did against Mizzou...

Mizzou had a shite arse line and lame arse linebackers.

FSU D > Bama's D and it's not like Auburn ran all over Bama.

FSU's Offense > Bama's O...and it's not like Auburn was shutting down Bama's offense.

People must really hate FSU or just not like the ACC to be this delusional about FSU and so full of SEC rah-rah bullshite.

You do really start believing your own bullshite if you chant SEC long enough, don't you?

This post was edited on 12/15/13 at 9:56 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Alahunter

Member since Jan 2008

90739 posts

Posted on 12/15/13 at 9:58 am to Zamoro10

quote:
just not like the ACC

FSU did some nice stat padding in that conference. They'll be exposed to a degree and won't be near the defense you expect them to be in the NC game.

eta- Bama has a better run defense than they do, and that's AFTER playing Auburn.

This post was edited on 12/15/13 at 10:00 am

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by SemperAuburn

Enterprise, AL

Member since Apr 2012

1337 posts

Posted on 12/15/13 at 10:09 am to Zamoro10

quote:
Mizzou had a shite arse line and lame arse linebackers.

FSU D > Bama's D and it's not like Auburn ran all over Bama.

This is how I know you're full of shite.

A) Mizzou had one of the most highly touted D-lines coming into the SECCG

B) Auburn had almost 300 rush yards against Bama (296 IIRC) I'd call that running all over them.

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board