re: Top 20 College jobs for recruiting by 247s JC Shurburtt

Sorry but the "Aggies are weird" justification for ranking us lower is just stupid. College Station is also a nicer college town than many on his list. He admits we are currently out recruiting his #1 as well and A&M actually has superior facilities now, a better stadium and fanbase, comparable money, and are in a FAR better conference. You can come up with reasons to rate A&M lower but his reasoning is terrible.

This isn't to say Texas shouldn't rate highly, they should. It's just a stretch to overlook how far the BDF has fallen and to consider the LHN a positive for recruiting. All the LHN means is you have 2 or 3 games a year that no one sees, kids want to be on ESPN and not LHN.

UF also should be higher. Michigan and Stanford should be higher. Ohio State should not be #2.

Either pick the list based on how it should be regardless of current performance (meaning location, facilities, conference, etc.) or don't. Mixing it just loses credibility.