Started By
Message
re: Criteria for the playoffs next year
Posted on 12/8/13 at 10:48 pm to CrimsonFanSince94
Posted on 12/8/13 at 10:48 pm to CrimsonFanSince94
Personally I don't care for the 4 team playoff. I think it should actually be 6+2 teams. I say 6 because in all likely hood the 6 highest ranked teams will involve the winners of the 6 aq conferences and then whoever the next highest ranked two teams are.
2
Posted on 12/8/13 at 10:52 pm to CarolinaCock
quote:
Personally I don't care for the 4 team playoff. I think it should actually be 6+2 teams. I say 6 because in all likely hood the 6 highest ranked teams will involve the winners of the 6 aq conferences and then whoever the next highest ranked two teams are.
There are only 5 power conferences now.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 10:53 pm to CarolinaCock
quote:
I say 6 because in all likely hood the 6 highest ranked teams will involve the winners of the 6 aq conferences and then whoever the next highest ranked two teams are.
Why should a four-loss conference champion get a shot at the title? They should at least put some sort of prerequisite in there like they have to be ranked in the top 10 in the BCS standings to make the playoffs. Giving a team from an AQ conference an automatic berth to the playoffs because they won their conference is ludicrous.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News