Started By
Message

re: Congrats to the SEC Rant 2013 ATS Champ: TxGunslinger10

Posted on 12/2/13 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
51860 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Their numbers look low! I say if you don't pick every team every week that should be a disqualification


That would be a little hard to get people to pick every game, every week. I think I might up it to a minimum of 40 or 50 games next year.

Thoughts from others?
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22426 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 1:33 pm to
50 sounds fair, it is much easier to just pick the sure games every week!
Posted by AUsteriskPride
Albuquerque, NM
Member since Feb 2011
18385 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 1:33 pm to
Yeah, 50 games would be fair.

Shawn Spencer is the most impressive IMO. But TX won according to the rules and should be recognized
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
25043 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

I think I might up it to a minimum of 40 or 50 games next year.

Thoughts from others?


I'd up it a bit. Do you know how many total games were pickable this year? I think requiring people to pick about half the total would be reasonable. Wonder what that number would be?
Posted by DeonG
Member since Aug 2009
466 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

That would be a little hard to get people to pick every game, every week. I think I might up it to a minimum of 40 or 50 games next year.

Thoughts from others?


40 might work. 50 seems high.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter