Started By
Message

re: How was the Alabama player not ejected?

Posted on 11/17/13 at 12:43 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 11/17/13 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

So you dont agree with your brethren that it was targeting?


If you go by the definition of the rule, it was targeting. He wasn't on the ground but it was very obvious he wasn't going anywhere. That made him defenseless as per the rule. It's a dumb rule anyway. There's a reason why we invented helmets for this game.

quote:

And you agree with an unnecessary roughness for simply tackling a guy?


He hit him with the crown of his helmet. He's lucky he wasn't ejected. I don't believe a flag should have been thrown but that's just me.

Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32172 posts
Posted on 11/17/13 at 12:55 pm to
quote:


If you go by the definition of the rule, it was targeting. He wasn't on the ground but it was very obvious he wasn't going anywhere. That made him defenseless as per the rule. It's a dumb rule anyway. There's a reason why we invented helmets for this game.




By the definition of the rule a state player was targeted.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter