Started By
Message

re: How was the Alabama player not ejected?

Posted on 11/17/13 at 12:19 pm to
Posted by OptimusDawg
Hangin With the Wolves
Member since Sep 2012
2300 posts
Posted on 11/17/13 at 12:19 pm to
quote:



The ball had already bounced inbounds. It's not the defenses responsibility to let the opposing team have unfettered access to a live ball. And I've already posted a youtube that clearly showed it was not head to head contact.



Good lord man you are delusional trying to defend the hit. He hit him as the ball got to him and it was clearly helmet to helmet. It doesn't matter since it wasn't called but its amazing how Bama fans will defend these kind of plays.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52899 posts
Posted on 11/17/13 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Good lord man you are delusional trying to defend the hit.


How are we delusional when its you guys that don't understand the rules?

quote:

He hit him as the ball got to him and it was clearly helmet to helmet. It doesn't matter since it wasn't called but its amazing how Bama fans will defend these kind of plays.


Why is it amazing that we defend perfectly legal plays? IT WAS A frickING KICKOFF. THE BALL WAS LIVE. How is that so hard to comprehend?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 11/17/13 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

He hit him as the ball got to him and it was clearly helmet to helmet


That doesn't matter on a kickoff. On a punt the ball is not in play until it touches a player. On a kickoff, the ball is in play once it goes 10 yards.

He could have destroyed him BEFORE the ball got to him and it would have been just as legal.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter