Started By
Message
re: List of SEC teams that would have played in the 2004 BCSNC
Posted on 11/15/13 at 8:59 am to BAMAisDIESEL09
Posted on 11/15/13 at 8:59 am to BAMAisDIESEL09
War Damn Eageauxl
0
Posted on 11/15/13 at 9:26 am to BAMAisDIESEL09
quote:
The following SEC teams will never be snubbed from the BCS National Championship if undefeated:
Alabama
While it wasn't a BCS nathional championship year, the 1966 undefeated crimpsun tied team says "huh?"
BTW, I know Randy Savage already beat me to this, but IDGAF.
Posted on 11/15/13 at 9:44 am to BAMAisDIESEL09
9/10
Posted on 11/15/13 at 10:00 am to BAMAisDIESEL09
quote:
Which SEC teams do you think would have played USC for the BCS National Championship if they were undefeated like Auburn was in 2004?
The following SEC teams will never be snubbed from the BCS National Championship if undefeated:
Alabama
Florida
LSU
Tennessee
Does it bother Auburn fans that their best team still wasnt considered good enough?
Posted on 11/15/13 at 10:11 am to BAMAisDIESEL09
Not only is this stupid but Oklahoma was on a string of 4 straight ranked top 5 seasons and USC was the 2003 Co National Champions.
There is no fricking way in hell that any team from the SEC would have leapfrogged them
There is no fricking way in hell that any team from the SEC would have leapfrogged them
Posted on 11/15/13 at 10:24 am to BAMAisDIESEL09
quote:
BAMAisDIESEL09
Posted on 11/15/13 at 11:39 am to BAMAisDIESEL09
I understood a little laughing at the undefeated aubs for not getting in the title game. But 9 years later, this thread is just stupid.
Of all the MANY things to ridicule about auburn, this isn't really one of them.
Of all the MANY things to ridicule about auburn, this isn't really one of them.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News