Started By
Message
re: Serious question for A&M fans RE: Briles and Baylor
Posted on 11/14/13 at 9:44 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 11/14/13 at 9:44 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Even when TCU and Oklahoma State were in the top 10, they barely made a dent in our recruiting. I doubt anything different with Baylor. If anything, they'll take away from the rest of the Big 12. Players that aren't afraid of SEC competition will still play in the SEC.
I tend to agree. It just seems that Baylor is riding a huge wave of momentum because of the way they play and well, they are Baylor, a typically bad to decent program. The SEC is a nice pull for players. Appreciate the response!
3
Posted on 11/14/13 at 10:13 am to hollywood23
It's hard to say. I'm sure they'll get a handful of players that we would like, just like they do now.
Posted on 11/14/13 at 10:28 am to hollywood23
Briles being successful at Baylor is a net win for A&M without a doubt. He hurts Texas and OU by doing well but has very little affect on us. Since we don't play Baylor and are now in the SEC they really can't do much.
The thing is, Baylor is always going to be Baylor. They are a moderate sized private school in a crappy town with terrible fan support. Baylor also isn't your typical private school, it takes being Baptist seriously. That means you have a student body filled with kids that were home schooled or came from high dollar private schools in the Texas metros and are very sheltered. Most of the folks that go there couldn't get in to A&M or Texas but are rich enough to pay 3 times the price to send their son/daughter off to Baylor so they can stay sheltered. The typical athlete there sticks out like a sore thumb. Their facilities are mediocre and pale in comparison to A&M. Their new stadium is literally less than half the size of A&M's and half the cost.
I'm not saying Baylor won't win the occasional recruiting battle with A&M but it will still be a rarity. It's mainly going to be kids that are promised the moon and want to be treated like rock stars rather than go play against top competition for play time. Baylor can also do some things for athletes A&M can't because they are a private school and don't have quite the same regulations because of it.
A 4 Star recruit can be almost assured of being a 4 year starter at Baylor for instance but certainly not at A&M or Texas for that matter. Honestly if a kid is worried about competing against other athletes they aren't going to fit at A&M anymore than they would at LSU or Bama so they are better off.
So as I said, it is far more concerning to Texas and OU who have to play Baylor every year. When Baylor humiliates OU like they did it certainly helps their head to head recruiting with a kid (especially one from Texas). If they do the same to Texas it will also help but be less important. Mainly though it will hurt Texas and OU by having those losses against a "lesser" school and it will put Baylor in a position to get first choice of the "others" in Texas which is significant. Texas produces over 200 scholarship football players per year and only so many go to A&M or Texas (or other major programs), if you can dominate the "rest" you will do well.
I would much rather Baylor win the BDF than Texas or OU, it says more about the BDF than it does Baylor.
The thing is, Baylor is always going to be Baylor. They are a moderate sized private school in a crappy town with terrible fan support. Baylor also isn't your typical private school, it takes being Baptist seriously. That means you have a student body filled with kids that were home schooled or came from high dollar private schools in the Texas metros and are very sheltered. Most of the folks that go there couldn't get in to A&M or Texas but are rich enough to pay 3 times the price to send their son/daughter off to Baylor so they can stay sheltered. The typical athlete there sticks out like a sore thumb. Their facilities are mediocre and pale in comparison to A&M. Their new stadium is literally less than half the size of A&M's and half the cost.
I'm not saying Baylor won't win the occasional recruiting battle with A&M but it will still be a rarity. It's mainly going to be kids that are promised the moon and want to be treated like rock stars rather than go play against top competition for play time. Baylor can also do some things for athletes A&M can't because they are a private school and don't have quite the same regulations because of it.
A 4 Star recruit can be almost assured of being a 4 year starter at Baylor for instance but certainly not at A&M or Texas for that matter. Honestly if a kid is worried about competing against other athletes they aren't going to fit at A&M anymore than they would at LSU or Bama so they are better off.
So as I said, it is far more concerning to Texas and OU who have to play Baylor every year. When Baylor humiliates OU like they did it certainly helps their head to head recruiting with a kid (especially one from Texas). If they do the same to Texas it will also help but be less important. Mainly though it will hurt Texas and OU by having those losses against a "lesser" school and it will put Baylor in a position to get first choice of the "others" in Texas which is significant. Texas produces over 200 scholarship football players per year and only so many go to A&M or Texas (or other major programs), if you can dominate the "rest" you will do well.
I would much rather Baylor win the BDF than Texas or OU, it says more about the BDF than it does Baylor.
Posted on 11/14/13 at 1:42 pm to hollywood23
Current A&M commits with Baylor offers: 13
Current Baylor commits with A&M offers: 3
Current Baylor commits with A&M offers: 3
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News