Started By
Message
re: A&M and Mizzou fans - what differences have you noticed in year 2 in the SEC?
Posted on 10/23/13 at 3:56 pm to Chuck U Farley
Posted on 10/23/13 at 3:56 pm to Chuck U Farley
There is no "higher quality" in the SECSECSEC.
Just a bunch of inbred hillbillies that can't read jerking each other off.
If two irrelevant Big 12 teams can dominate in the SECSECSEC, then real teams like Texas should win.
After all, the only reason Alabama won the 2009 title was because Colt got hit illegally.
Just a bunch of inbred hillbillies that can't read jerking each other off.
If two irrelevant Big 12 teams can dominate in the SECSECSEC, then real teams like Texas should win.
After all, the only reason Alabama won the 2009 title was because Colt got hit illegally.
Posted on 10/23/13 at 4:38 pm to Randalff Dook
quote:
then real teams like Texas should win.
Congrats on the 44-23 home loss to the probable 5th place SECW team. Hook'em!
Posted on 10/23/13 at 4:49 pm to Randalff Dook
quote:
re: A&M and Mizzou fans - what differences have you noticed in year 2 in the SEC? (Posted on 10/23/13 at 3:56 pm to Chuck U Farley) There is no "higher quality" in the SECSECSEC. Just a bunch of inbred hillbillies that can't read jerking each other off. If two irrelevant Big 12 teams can dominate in the SECSECSEC, then real teams like Texas should win. After all, the only reason Alabama won the 2009 title was because Colt got hit illegally.
Although you are probably some jelly SEC alter, you probably have captured the butthurt of many shorthorn fans.
I and any rational person knew that certainly over the last decade that the SEC was the premier football conference. Only the jelly would deny that. Alabama may have won the most titles but since 1997 FIVE different SEC teams have been National Champions and three of those have repeat appearances during that time. Facts don't lie, only biased jelly fans do that.
This post was edited on 10/23/13 at 5:32 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News