Started By
Message

re: Have rival fans lost all hope when it comes to stopping Bama's dynasty?

Posted on 10/4/13 at 8:47 am to
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37856 posts
Posted on 10/4/13 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Just about every single national title can be questioned. No sec champ has ever been questioned.
You think a bcs title is the end all be all and the coaches an players have very little control over winning the BCS title. The only title every sec team controls it's destiny on is the seccg. No on respects a national title when you weren't even champ of your own division , let alone conference. I guess you've forgotten that after bama was gifted a BCSCG appearance( solely by media and voting bias because Oklahoma st had a far better resume) every single conf president demanded change.


This is just patently ridculous and full of LSU homerism....if you want to bag on Bama's national titles then OK....so if we are measuring by SEC titles bama is even more succesful by your definition as we have 23 SEC titles...or are you gonna dispute that to?

Its retarded to claim winning the SEC is more imporatnt than a national title becuase you haven't played the top dog from the Pac, B1G, Bevo12, Notre Dame or wherever....you can't say an SEC title is more important when its a regional conference championship and you haven't played the best from another conference like Texas, tOSU, Oregon, USC, or Notre Dame.....you don't know your the best until you have beat the best and the best is not exculsively the SEC.
This post was edited on 10/4/13 at 8:50 am
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46650 posts
Posted on 10/4/13 at 9:17 am to
This is just patently ridculous and full of LSU homerism....if you want to bag on Bama's national titles then OK....so if we are measuring by SEC titles bama is even more succesful by your definition as we have 23 SEC titles...or are you gonna dispute that to?

I've always said Bama's 23 sec titles are far more impressive than all those bogus MNC. Also the bcs title is subjective as hell. You get voted into. The coaches and players have very little control over making the BCSCG. Take last year for example, had ohio state not self imposed a bowl ban, the BCSCG would've been Notre same vs Ohio state. Would bama being left out of the BCSCG changed the fact that bama was the best team last year? frick no. The national title in in cfb is the most hollow trophy in all of sports. Every single year , as soon as the game BCSCG is over, there is a debate on if the VOTERS GOT THE TWO TEAMS RIGHT. Do you know what you never hear questioned? Who won the sec. The bcs is bull shite and I haven't cared about it since 2004. This is just my opinion.

ETA: I'd rather win back to back sec titles than one bcs title any day. It's far more rare and can't be questioned.
This post was edited on 10/4/13 at 9:19 am
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46650 posts
Posted on 10/4/13 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Its retarded to claim winning the SEC is more imporatnt than a national title becuase you haven't played the top dog from the Pac, B1G, Bevo12, Notre Dame or wherever....you can't say an SEC title is more important when its a regional conference championship and you haven't played the best from another conference like Texas, tOSU, Oregon, USC, or Notre Dame.....you don't know your the best until you have beat the best and the best is not exculsively the SEC. This post was edited on 10/4 at 8:50 am



Ha ha this is funny. In 2011 lsu destroyed the PAC 12 champ and rose bowl winner and destroyed the big east champ and orange bowl winner.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter