Started By
Message

re: Missouri's future vs. Tennessee's future.

Posted on 10/1/13 at 9:09 pm to
Posted by brick
Member since May 2009
1159 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Chavis left UT and they fall, goes to LSU and they rise. Guy was never a head coach but his presence on a team sure seems to affect their success.






I agree that Chavis was a great asset to Tennessee, but Cutcliffe was the difference maker, without him Fulmer was lost.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
55240 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

I agree that Chavis was a great asset to Tennessee, but Cutcliffe was the difference maker, without him Fulmer was lost.


It is when you get more than 1 that the multiplier effect kicks in.

Right after Bryant left UK, Collier replaced him and put this staff together (Don Shula, Chuck Knox, Howard Schnellenberger and Bill Arnsparger) but he could not recruit and the Bryant "hole" created so much expectation. Imagine if Bryant had stayed at UK with that staff!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter