Started By
Message
re: Missouri's future vs. Tennessee's future.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:33 pm to SunHog
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:33 pm to SunHog
quote:
player development
SunHog, I see the rest of your argument, but player development is there. We have put a few All-Pros in the NFL in the last 7 years.
The development is there. It's just one piece of the puzzle though.
1
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:45 pm to Remote Controlled
quote:
It's just one piece of the puzzle though.
I think you're over looking this a little. If you aren't pulling in 5* running backs and or QB's along with loaded 4* lineman you better have some serious player development. I'm not talking about keeping up with the average number of sending players to the NFL. You would need to be well above average to win in this league.
Y'all have a chance to branch out to all those B1G kids in Illinois that no one else is close to besides Kentucky. I would heavily look at what Kentucky has been doing in the past and do the opposite. Y'all are basically mirror images of each other yet Missouri doesn't have a Louisville in the state. (Bonus)
Kentucky has been sitting underneath Ohio (tons of talent) yet never seemed to capitalize and the same could be said for y'all about Illinois. Mizzou needs a game in Illinois or at least in St. Louis against Illinois just like Arkansas is in Texas.
This post was edited on 10/1/13 at 8:46 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News