Started By
Message
re: Missouri's future vs. Tennessee's future.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:28 pm to Remote Controlled
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:28 pm to Remote Controlled
The game has changed.
Tennessee is having a much harder time recruiting Georgia and South Carolina's recruiting grounds with the successes of Clemson, USC and UGA. However, they have their facilities in place.
Missouri needs better facilities, player development and coaching across the board and last but certainly not least, they need to recruit Illinois heavily!
I think Missouri will compete if those steps are accomplished however if they are not they will remain at Kentucky's caliber. I'm giving the edge to Tennessee as they just currently start with more in facilities and tradition.
You gotta have these..
Tennessee is having a much harder time recruiting Georgia and South Carolina's recruiting grounds with the successes of Clemson, USC and UGA. However, they have their facilities in place.
Missouri needs better facilities, player development and coaching across the board and last but certainly not least, they need to recruit Illinois heavily!
I think Missouri will compete if those steps are accomplished however if they are not they will remain at Kentucky's caliber. I'm giving the edge to Tennessee as they just currently start with more in facilities and tradition.
You gotta have these..
This post was edited on 10/1/13 at 8:30 pm
1
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:33 pm to SunHog
quote:
player development
SunHog, I see the rest of your argument, but player development is there. We have put a few All-Pros in the NFL in the last 7 years.
The development is there. It's just one piece of the puzzle though.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News