Started By
Message
re: Landmassers, let's be honest.
Posted on 9/24/13 at 12:04 pm to HottyToddy7
Posted on 9/24/13 at 12:04 pm to HottyToddy7
Look at it this way. When Mullen beat Nutt in 09 they said they were content with just winning 6 every year and maybe winning 8-10 every few years. They ride that for a while unitl we hire Freeze and Freeze kick their arse on the field and in recruiting. They then find reasons to get mad at Mullen. Mullen was great whilel he was beating OM, awful when not.
Stans was god. Then OM started to get competitive and Stans then seems to have run his course and they make a change.
You may not see it but they are happy when they are better then us. Upset when they are not and will do whatever it takes to be at our level or higher.
We were fine with Nutt after losing to Mullen in 09. We were more upset with JSU and Vandy then the 09 egg bowl. Most people were happy with beating LSU and losing to State.
Stans was god. Then OM started to get competitive and Stans then seems to have run his course and they make a change.
You may not see it but they are happy when they are better then us. Upset when they are not and will do whatever it takes to be at our level or higher.
We were fine with Nutt after losing to Mullen in 09. We were more upset with JSU and Vandy then the 09 egg bowl. Most people were happy with beating LSU and losing to State.
This post was edited on 9/24/13 at 12:06 pm
2
Posted on 9/24/13 at 1:18 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
Stans was god. Then OM started to get competitive and Stans then seems to have run his course and they make a change.
what a crock of shite
Posted on 9/24/13 at 1:28 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
Stans was god. Then OM started to get competitive and Stans then seems to have run his course and they make a change.
Say what?
Stans went 13-1 against you in Starkville and 8-6 against you in Oxford. You never "got competitive".
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News