Started By
Message
re: How far has Kentucky fallen behind Louisville in athletics?
Posted on 9/1/13 at 11:55 pm to Slinger16
Posted on 9/1/13 at 11:55 pm to Slinger16
quote:
Will it continue long enough to change the school into a perennial athletic powerhouse like Ohio St. or LSU, is the real question.
I would say probably not. It takes more then one or two years of success to even come remotely close to being that good.
quote:
The move to the ACC will help in the long run even if the teams records take a hit during the transition.
The problem for UofL is in the ACC in basketball they will always play second fiddle to UNC and Duke. And in football, it remains to be seen how well they can do in a much better conference than the Big East or C-USA ever was week in and week out.
Posted on 9/2/13 at 12:00 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
The problem for UofL is in the ACC in basketball they will always play second fiddle to UNC and Duke. And in football, it remains to be seen how well they can do in a much better conference than the Big East or C-USA ever was week in and week out.
And once Strong leaves for greener pastures after this season
Posted on 9/2/13 at 12:01 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
It takes more then one or two years of success to even come remotely close to being that good.
Right. It takes money and a dedication to put forth a top notch product. The AD is on a hot streak with his coaching hires and the school spends A TON of cash on the athletic program and it seems (for now) to be paying off.
quote:
I would say probably not.
Damn, you done caught the angries, too.
quote:
The problem for UofL is in the ACC in basketball they will always play second fiddle to UNC and Duke. And in football, it remains to be seen how well they can do in a much better conference than the Big East or C-USA ever was week in and week out.
Second fiddle, third fiddle... who gives a shite? Just win, bottom line.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News