re: (Final Draft) Evidence Mounts of a Scandal in the SEC

quote:

---

Auburn does not belong on a list like this.




They absolutely do, as long as he's using their schedule as part of his "conspiracy" argument.

Either add them, or don't bring them up at all.

---

I don't know why he brought Auburn into it, either. I think at one point in his argument (I am not going back to read it again--maybe it was in an earlier "draft") he mentions the possibility that Auburn getting an easier game was done so Alabama wouldn't be the only one (which would make what is already obvious even more obvious), but who cares about Auburn anyway? He could have stuck to the issue (Bama being coddled and protected by an alum who is in charge of scheduling), and there is more than enough. Adding the Auburn angle doesn't help his case, IMO, so I wouldn't have brought it up if I were he.