Started By
Message
re: Let's Talk About the Real Reason Mizzou Was Invited to Join the SEC
Posted on 7/1/13 at 4:08 pm to mizzoukills
Posted on 7/1/13 at 4:08 pm to mizzoukills
Dude seriously
The conference offices don't give a shite about arKansas
Or mizzou for that matter
The conference offices don't give a shite about arKansas
Or mizzou for that matter
3
Posted on 7/1/13 at 4:10 pm to danfraz
quote:
The conference offices don't give a shite about arKansas Or mizzou for that matter
Sure they do. Regardless of how the piglets act on here, the fact of the matter is that they are rich. So is Mizzou. Now that two long lost lovers are reunited, it's time for us to run shite.
However, give us 10 years.
Posted on 7/1/13 at 4:11 pm to danfraz
quote:
Dude seriously
The conference offices don't give a shite about arKansas
Or mizzou for that matter
Occasionally I intuitively read posts in a slow-retarded drawl. Yours happens to be one of those.
The league cares about it's overall brand, and Arkansas is apart of that brand. So they do care.
Kills point about Arkansas needing a rival, which would add value to the overall SEC brand is spot on.
This post was edited on 7/1/13 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 7/1/13 at 4:13 pm to danfraz
The reason Mizzou was added because a 13 member conference was a nightmare and Slive was out of good options. You weren't last pick I'm sure but no way you were one of the first few choices either.
There is no other explanation, Mizzou is a terrible fit in the SEC. I think you guys go BIG as soon as the next realignment dominoes fall. You win and the SEC wins. I think we drop Mizzou take UNC, Duke, and Virginia and call it a conference.
There is no other explanation, Mizzou is a terrible fit in the SEC. I think you guys go BIG as soon as the next realignment dominoes fall. You win and the SEC wins. I think we drop Mizzou take UNC, Duke, and Virginia and call it a conference.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News