Started By
Message

re: A&M AD misspeaks: Oregon apparently back on. USC-w not.

Posted on 5/31/13 at 11:19 am to
Posted by lowspark12
nashville, tn
Member since Aug 2009
22373 posts
Posted on 5/31/13 at 11:19 am to
I understood your comment... my point was you (the season ticket holder) would be spending money on four crappy OOC games, instead of having one good OOC matchup.... the bang for your buck would be less.

We've had some OOC home matchups over the last decade that would've never happened with your line of thinking...

2009 WVU
2010 Clemson
2001 Syracuse
2007 Kansas State

Those were all exciting/ enjoyable games... and the tix would've cost that same for 1:00pm matchup with Northwestern State.
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 5/31/13 at 11:26 am to
quote:

I understood your comment... my point was you (the season ticket holder) would be spending money on four crappy OOC games, instead of having one good OOC matchup.... the bang for your buck would be less.


You must have switched gears then on me bec I wasnt talking about my money.

But I get what you are saying. The only bang I need is a W...I dont care if its against Furman or Nebraska.

quote:

We've had some OOC home matchups over the last decade that would've never happened with your line of thinking...

2009 WVU
2010 Clemson
2001 Syracuse
2007 Kansas State


And Im ok with that bec the 08 WVU game, 2000 Cuse game, and 2011 CU games were games we didnt need to play. The 2008 WVU game kept us out of a bowl. The 2000 Cuse game kept us from a possible 10 win season. The 2011 CU game kept us from a possible NY Day bowl. Thats money the school could have used.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter