Started By
Message

re: Cowherd takes shots at Alabama scheduling and the SEC

Posted on 5/14/13 at 2:09 pm to
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19458 posts
Posted on 5/14/13 at 2:09 pm to
To repeat, LSU's AD did not sign off on this schedule. Either he is lying or Slive is. But JA was adamant that he had no say so whatsoever.
Posted by CheeseburgerEddie
Crimson Tide Fan Club
Member since Oct 2012
15574 posts
Posted on 5/14/13 at 2:12 pm to
He could be lying to placate fans pissed off at the situation. Just saying it is a possibility, Slive could be lying and is trying to give the SEC teams which seem most likely to compete for the title an easier shot. I just feel like more AD's would have come out and been more vocal if that was the case.
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 5/14/13 at 2:15 pm to
Thing is, if LSU loses to Alabama or A&M, they still have 3 other quality opponents and will be in the NC game with possibly 2 loses. That's never happened before........has it?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 5/14/13 at 2:15 pm to
I did find this comment. I could see where it implies he had no input, but it really doesn't specify one way or the other.


quote:

Some of you have expressed dismay that other schools may benefit from a less challenging non-divisional schedule in 2013. Scheduling is a complex matter and, though I may not always agree with the outcome, I know the SEC office works diligently in every way to make the best decisions for the league and its members.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter