Started By
Message
re: Cowherd takes shots at Alabama scheduling and the SEC
Posted on 5/14/13 at 2:09 pm to 14&Counting
Posted on 5/14/13 at 2:09 pm to 14&Counting
To repeat, LSU's AD did not sign off on this schedule. Either he is lying or Slive is. But JA was adamant that he had no say so whatsoever.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 2:12 pm to Keltic Tiger
He could be lying to placate fans pissed off at the situation. Just saying it is a possibility, Slive could be lying and is trying to give the SEC teams which seem most likely to compete for the title an easier shot. I just feel like more AD's would have come out and been more vocal if that was the case.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 2:15 pm to Keltic Tiger
Thing is, if LSU loses to Alabama or A&M, they still have 3 other quality opponents and will be in the NC game with possibly 2 loses. That's never happened before........has it?
Posted on 5/14/13 at 2:15 pm to Keltic Tiger
I did find this comment. I could see where it implies he had no input, but it really doesn't specify one way or the other.
quote:
Some of you have expressed dismay that other schools may benefit from a less challenging non-divisional schedule in 2013. Scheduling is a complex matter and, though I may not always agree with the outcome, I know the SEC office works diligently in every way to make the best decisions for the league and its members.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)