Started By
Message
re: bama lost alot on both sides of the ball
Posted on 4/29/13 at 11:34 am to 167back
Posted on 4/29/13 at 11:34 am to 167back
quote:
Headsup last november
Headsup comparison for WRs? Really? How bout we try something with actual meaning like how they compared against 5 common opponents:
LSU returning WRs:
61 catches, 791 yards, 3 TDs
Bama returning WRs:
58 catches, 893 yards, 9 TDs
Which was the better unit?
1
Posted on 4/29/13 at 5:16 pm to sarc
Yo sacA. How bout this one?
Before going any farther the numbers you posted for common opponents are not quite the same as what I found.
Common five plus what we did heads up. I really think what we did against each other should count for something.
LSU
77 receptions 972 yards 4 TDs
bama
65 receptions 974 yards 7 TDs
In those SIX games LSU's top THREE receivers had MORE receptions for MORE yards and MORE TDs than any WR on the bama roster not named cooper.
LSU WR corps had better numbers as a whole VS three of the five common opponents and better heads up VS each other.
Before going any farther the numbers you posted for common opponents are not quite the same as what I found.
Common five plus what we did heads up. I really think what we did against each other should count for something.
LSU
77 receptions 972 yards 4 TDs
bama
65 receptions 974 yards 7 TDs
In those SIX games LSU's top THREE receivers had MORE receptions for MORE yards and MORE TDs than any WR on the bama roster not named cooper.
LSU WR corps had better numbers as a whole VS three of the five common opponents and better heads up VS each other.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News