Started By
Message
re: if 16 are teams are inevitable
Posted on 3/29/13 at 10:40 am to Hogules68
Posted on 3/29/13 at 10:40 am to Hogules68
Rank the teams, therefore rank the divisions.
My take:
Inverse scoring (Lower is better)
SEC North: 41
SEC Gulf: 34
SEC Central: 32
SEC East: 29
I know I will get flamed for having LSU so high and Tenn so low, but that's the way I predict it will play out longterm.
And my conclusion is North is pretty weak.
My take:
quote:
SECNORTH
Kentucky 15
Tennessee 5
Arkansas 8
Missouri 13
SECGULF
Texas AM 7
LSU 3
Ole Miss 10
MissSt 14
SECentral
Alabama 1
Auburn 6
Vanderbilt 16
South Carolina 9
SECEast
Florida 2
Georgia 4
North Carolina 12
Virginia Tech 11
Inverse scoring (Lower is better)
SEC North: 41
SEC Gulf: 34
SEC Central: 32
SEC East: 29
I know I will get flamed for having LSU so high and Tenn so low, but that's the way I predict it will play out longterm.
And my conclusion is North is pretty weak.
Posted on 3/29/13 at 10:49 am to Stingray
quote:
SEC WEST
A&M - 7
Mizzou - 13
Ark - 8
LSU - 3
SEC CENTRAL
Ole Miss - 10
MSU - 14
Bama - 1
AUB - 6
SEC NORTH
Vandy - 16
Tennessee - 5
Kentucky - 15
Va Tech - 11
SEC EAST
Florida - 2
Georgia - 4
S Carolina - 9
N Carolina - 12
So assuming your rankings are accurate, here is a breakdown of the other suggestion.
West - 31
Central - 31
North - 47
East - 25
Posted on 3/29/13 at 1:05 pm to Stingray
quote:
I know I will get flamed for having LSU so high and Tenn so low,
Ole Miss over Va. Tech is a curious choice, too. I'm also skeptical about Alabama at #1, if you're thinking long term. After Saban retires, I wouldn't be surprised to see them go into another 20-30 year up-and-down period like they did after Bear Bryant died. Florida is likely to be more consistent than Alabama over that time frame.
This post was edited on 3/29/13 at 1:05 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)