Started By
Message
re: Who do you NOT want in the SEC
Posted on 3/10/13 at 11:52 pm to rtr14
Posted on 3/10/13 at 11:52 pm to rtr14
quote:
I know. It just sucks that we can't even play the whole damn conference. I mean Bama hasn't played Kentucky since the 09 season, and probably won't play USCe and UF for another few years. It just sucks. They need to either add more games to the schedule, or get rid of some of these rivalries. Either way no one wins.
Heard it explained the other day that this sets up for good odds that there will be no rematches in the SECCG according to the computer.
I thought long and hard about it, looked at the various schedules, and to some degree it makes sense.
Think about it, there was the SC/Auburn rematch in '09, but none since and even fewer since they handed the scheduling over to that computer consulting firm that is doing the algorithms with the conference scheduling.
Has there been a rematch in Atlanta other than SC/Aub in '09 and UF/Auburn in 2000? I honestly do not know.
3
Posted on 3/10/13 at 11:55 pm to scrooster
Had to stop myself from posting " what's the big deal about rematches in the Championship game?"
This post was edited on 3/10/13 at 11:56 pm
Posted on 3/11/13 at 12:09 am to scrooster
quote:
Has there been a rematch in Atlanta other than SC/Aub in '09 and UF/Auburn in 2000? I honestly do not know.
Bama and Florida in 1999. LSU and Tennessee in 2001. UT beat LSU during the regular season but LSU beat them in the SECCG. Also Auburn and Tennessee back in 04. Auburn went undefeated that year.
Posted on 3/11/13 at 2:06 am to scrooster
Southern Miss will never be a viable option for any BCS AQ conference. Not enough support, money, fans, and they add absolutely 0 revenue possibility to the conference they join.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News