Started By
Message
re: SEC Baseball History: Chart of Champions
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:04 pm to notsince98
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:04 pm to notsince98
quote:
Otherwise, scheduling differences are too great to consider them legit titles in many seasons.
I didn't even think it would be a debate that regular season title>>>tournament title.
A whole conference schedule outweighs the few played in the SEC tourny.
1
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:05 pm to bigbowe80
This post was edited on 2/14/13 at 10:03 am
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:07 pm to bigbowe80
quote:
Sure right now they are but I thought we were talking about all-time Historical significance. At the end of the day, the end-all measuring stick in any sport has got to be national championships. Just ask Alabama about that in football right?
Obviously historically it's LSU, but I'm not afraid to say SC is on par with LSU in baseball right now. I could give 2 shits about Bama and football. They only play 1 sport as far as they are concerned.
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:09 pm to JDM1992
quote:
It's more about having decades and decades of success. (
quote:
LSU definitely has the edge over South Carolina in that department.
LSU does not have decades and decades of dominance as opposed to SC in baseball. In fact SC went to Omaha times 5 before LSU made it once. What LSU had was a great run in the '90s that has continued tow today. Also like I mentioned before both SC and LSU have 6 appearances in the CWS title game / series. Where LSU distances itself is that LSU is 6-0, SC is 2-4... impressive for LSU undoubtedly but decades and decades > than SC? I don't think so.
This post was edited on 1/15/13 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:11 pm to theGarnetWay
This post was edited on 2/14/13 at 10:03 am
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:11 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
What the crap? And arkansas acts like they are good in baseball? What a joke
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:11 pm to theGarnetWay
Our 90s was so good it counted as 3 decades.
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:12 pm to omrebelfan20
This post was edited on 2/14/13 at 10:02 am
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:12 pm to JDM1992
quote:
SEC Baseball History
quote:
Well, neither are nationally top 5 historicaly.
You must be confused on the thread topic.
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:13 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
In fact SC went to Omaha times 5 before LSU made it once. What LSU had was a great run in the '90s that has continued tow today.
yep, this is fact.
also, LSU won all, but one of their NCs I believe, when the championship game format was still just 1 game instead of a 3 game series.
so kudos go to LSU winning that first game where we fricked up and lost while it was in that format.
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:13 pm to JDM1992
quote:
Well, neither are nationally top 5 historicaly.
Despite their relatively recent outburst in success its hard to not put LSU in there. So.Cal runs away with it with 12 national titles but isn't LSU 2nd with 6? I think Texas has 5 or 6 as well and ASU has another 5. Either way LSU has to be in there.
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:13 pm to JDM1992
True, and im not really surprised but they talk about Bud Walton Arena all the time which AK could sleep through the game and still win. Talk about baseball but OM will slap them around again this year. I had no idea they have always been below mediocrity in SEC play and SEC tournaments.
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:16 pm to JDM1992
quote:
Well, neither are nationally top 5 historicaly. So.....
Nice troll attempt
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:18 pm to theGarnetWay
This post was edited on 2/14/13 at 10:02 am
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:20 pm to JDM1992
Virginia and North Carolina should be considered as well
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:23 pm to omrebelfan20
This post was edited on 2/14/13 at 10:02 am
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:25 pm to JDM1992
Well i didnt mean top 5 but as far as being nationally relevant top 10 or 15 they as well as fsu would definitely be there
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:25 pm to JDM1992
You should really stick to football
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:26 pm to JimMorrison
quote:
I didn't even think it would be a debate that regular season title>>>tournament title.
A whole conference schedule outweighs the few played in the SEC tourny.
So when the regular season champ avoides the #2 and #3 teams on their schedule while the #2 team was lucky enough avoid the worst two teams in the league and neither team played each eother.... you feel that the first place team is undoubtedly the best team in the league?
Posted on 1/15/13 at 1:27 pm to omrebelfan20
quote:What. The. frick.
Virginia and North Carolina should be considered as well
Virginia- 2 CWS appearances all time, no titles
UNC- 9 CWS appearances, no titles
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News