Started By
Message
re: Bama's "dynasty" was nearly a 10-3 team
Posted on 1/11/13 at 10:16 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Posted on 1/11/13 at 10:16 pm to Rickdaddy4188
The Florida team.came out of nowhere. Prior to the season it was widely expected and rightfully so that LSU had an easier schedule than Bama because of one game only and that was Michigan; however, as the season progressed everyone saw Michigan for what they we're average at best and no one saw Flojrida coming. They were not particularly respected until they beat LSU and that was before ZM had made any progression or your OL had gelled. Had LAU played FLa later I think the results would have been different especially if they played like ZM did against Bama.
1
Posted on 1/11/13 at 10:21 pm to labamafan
quote:
The Florida team.came out of nowhere. Prior to the season it was widely expected and rightfully so that LSU had an easier schedule than Bama because of one game only and that was Michigan; however, as the season progressed everyone saw Michigan for what they we're average at best and no one saw Flojrida coming. They were not particularly respected until they beat LSU and that was before ZM had made any progression or your OL had gelled. Had LAU played FLa later I think the results would have been different especially if they played like ZM did against Bama.
Once we lost Faulk( we've ran behind him for the last two years) I knew we were screwed. I know a lot of rantards think this year is a failure, but with the players we lost, it was actually pretty damn decent. Since the spring game , LSU lost, starting rb, 3 Olineman, starting cb and 2 starting lbs and we won 10 games. Losing to Clemson sucked though. We had t lost to an ACC team in 57 years.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News