Started By
Message

re: Bama's "dynasty" was nearly a 10-3 team

Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:41 pm to
Posted by tider04
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2007
5606 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

And thankfully Bama was given a schedule to help with that rebuilding process. Played 2 regular season games against legit teams and "nearly" lost both of those. LSU on the other hand played 4 regular season games against legit teams.
But there's no preferential treatment for Bama. None at all.

And in a few years when Bama is playing the tough East teams while LSU plays the weaker teams will you bitch and moan and cry injustice then? These schedules are on a cycle.
Posted by ScoopAndScore
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2008
11986 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

And in a few years when Bama is playing the tough East teams while LSU plays the weaker teams will you bitch and moan and cry injustice then? These schedules are on a cycle

Posted by aroussel3Tigers
Member since Mar 2009
4905 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

These schedules are on a cycle.
oh really?
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46652 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 4:13 pm to
[quote]And in a few years when Bama is playing the tough East teams while LSU plays the weaker teams will you bitch and moan and cry injustice then? These schedules are on a cycle. [/quote
When will this happen. After next year Bama will have play the top 3 teams in the east a TOTAL of 1 time( UF in 2011), while LSU will have played them 5 times (uf3,usc3, uga1).
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 4:14 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter